A root cause analysis (RCA) report is used to analyze a recurring problem and help eliminate its root causes. RCA teams should drill down to the root of the problem to implement solutions with a lasting impact. Improve business processes and boost productivity by incorporating this root cause analysis documentation template into your problem-solving techniques. Our featured RCA template has been built for you to efficiently:
Root cause analysis (RCA) is a methodical approach to determining the root causes of a problem in order to come up with plausible solutions. Root cause analyses can help ensure the prevention of recurring problems, validating that RCA-recommended actions can improve business processes and boost productivity.
A root cause analysis template (also known as an RCA template) is used by cross-functional teams (CFTs) of subject matter experts to construct a good problem statement, collect relevant data, effectively identify the root cause, and implement lasting solutions. Utilizing mobile-ready root cause analysis templates can help teams take immediate action to resolve issues and cultivate a culture of collaboration and accountability.
Various tools are used to facilitate root cause analysis better, so it is crucial to have a clear understanding of the organization and its context to be able to pick the right RCA format. Moreover, different business problems entail a specific approach to reach an accurate conclusion of the root cause, formulate correct solutions, and achieve optimum results. Here are 4 of the best RCA tools to help you determine the right approach for your problem.
One of the most widely used problem-solving techniques is the 5 whys analysis. It is applied to universal problems across various industries due to its simple but practical nature, especially when implementing kaizen in your organization. With this root cause analysis format, pinpoint the root cause by asking, “Why did this problem occur?” five times. Use a 5 whys analysis template for initial root cause analysis and easily build a culture of collaboration and accountability among employees.
An FMEA aims to anticipate potential problems before they happen so that their adverse effects on customers can be mitigated. Product design and process improvement professionals perform failure modes and effects analysis to prevent costly manufacturing failures and increase customer satisfaction. A highly functional FMEA template is crucial for success in implementing FMEAs.
Quality engineers in the automotive industry first developed 8D for comprehensive RCAs of critical problems in the production process. Applying the 8D approach in healthcare, retail, and manufacturing has also been proven to drive effective system changes. Conduct an 8D root cause analysis when safety or regulatory issues have been discovered in your business and repetitive customer complaints about your product/service are received. Permanent remedial actions based on data and information related to the problem can be established using an 8D template and an 8D RCA report.
For any project that needs improvement, follow the DMAIC process (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) and focus efforts on the analyze phase. As the most recognized Six Sigma methodology, its strength lies in the structure and rigor from quantifying the problem to implementing long-term solutions. Use a digital DMAIC template to break down the root cause analysis by defining performance objectives, identifying value/non-value added process steps, and specifying the sources of variation.
Following one of the frameworks of one of the most comprehensive root cause analysis techniques, listed below are sample questions team leaders can ask when performing root cause analysis:
Question #1:
Is my problem-solving team trained enough and aware of their respective functions?
Question #2:
Does our problem statement answer the 5 Ws and 2 Hs for greater clarity and accuracy?
Question #3:
Can these actions temporarily isolate the problem from our customers in the future?
Question #4:
Does the root cause reveal nonconformance or hidden flaws in the system?
Question #5:
Can these possible solutions change the product and/or process conditions to permanently solve the problem?
Question #6:
Were actions communicated to all stakeholders to mitigate the risk and to measure improvements?
Question #7:
Were similar products and/or processes reviewed and work procedures updated for problem prevention?
Question #8:
Have I provided relevant feedback and recognized both team and individual efforts?
The root cause analysis can be done in a few simple steps which are as follows:
Learn more about how to comprehensively do the root cause analysis here .
To offer further insight into how this tool can be applied by organizations, below are real-life examples of implementing root cause analysis in the manufacturing and construction industry:
Problem: Innovative Ideas Corporation, a leading producer of raw materials for electronic gadgets, experienced a disruption in their daily operations. There’s an oil spill on the loading dock that has not only rendered a portion of the dock inaccessible but also poses a serious risk to the safety of workers and vehicles maneuvering in the area.
The on-site safety personnel was immediately dispatched to look into the issue and identify what caused the spill. Sawyer James Loren, the safety personnel, deemed it best to use the 5 Why’s method for this analysis.
Is the root cause of the problem identified? Yes. The main reason for the oil spill that created a workplace hazard is the incentive scheme that compromises the safety of the employees.
While performing the RCA and working through the 5 Whys, the management also implemented countermeasures along the way to mitigate short-term risks while working to implement corrective actions and preventive actions at the root cause level.
Problem: A backhoe operator in a busy construction site was maneuvering a backhoe when it suddenly jerked and made a loud clanging noise. The operator immediately stopped and realized that the backhoe had struck an underground utility line.
The project manager was immediately notified of the incident. An investigation using the 5 Whys method is used to deep-dive into the situation and identify the cause of the problem.
Upon discovering the root cause of the problem, the project manager communicated to both parties. He reiterated the importance of keeping all the records updated consistently to avoid the recurrence of incidents that can cause safety hazards to the site and the people involved.
The utility company and the records department both guaranteed to communicate well and perform regular audits to make sure that all records are updated as often as necessary.
Problem: A freight delivery time was missed
Countermeasures:
Also, below is an example of a completed Root Cause Analysis Report.